apalrd wrote:
Multiplexing a lot of high speed IO on a smaller number of timers is a recipe for disaster if they ever happen to overlap or be close to overlap.....
Some of the usefulness is reduced if it's too difficult to modify.
Some of the usefulness is reduced if it's too difficult to modify.
1 timer is what they have, so its a SW solution for what most consider a HW application.
I would argue ALL the usefulness is gone when its too difficult to work with.....and most car guys have little to no C or any other programming experience which is why the commercial replacement ECUs are pre-setup for most applications these days....plug and play which includes a base tune. The setup needs to be simple....then there are people who can do more, but I couldn't actually program much beyond basic math functions which is why something like enginelab works for me.
tubines huh? .....constant flow, no time critical anything other then measure rpm I guess.....yeah, must be nice
