gemellocattivo.com http://gemellocattivo.com/forum/ |
|
Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! http://gemellocattivo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=162 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | cribbj [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
My 550 is being relinered with Darton DI liners by Steve Demirjian, and I'm running the numbers on whether I need to move the piston pin heights to compensate. Reason being of course that the stock Ferrari system has the liners sitting proud of the deck by 0.03 to 0.08mm and with the Darton's the liners will be flush with the deck. Too, the deck surfaces will be machined down just a tad to make them equal (currently the left bank deck is about 0.005" higher than the right), and to ensure the liners are flush. Original "as found" block deck heights w/o liners: Left:...........7.915"........201.04mm Right:.........7.910"........200.91mm Rod length:...5.157"........131mm Stroke:........2.953"..........75mm Pin Height:...1.299"..........33mm So figuring what the theoretical assembled height is of the stock piston at TDC, I have 7.933" or 201.5mm, which is taller than the actual deck heights w/o liners, and still a bit taller than the deck with liners. So for the stock setup my piston is "out of the hole" by about 0.5mm. Once the new liners are installed, we're shooting for these final block deck heights: Left:.........7.905"........200.79mm Right:.......7.905"........200.79mm I'm not changing the rods or the stroke, so the only dimension I can change is the pin height, and on the old Mahle pistons, the top of the pin was nearly at the oil ring groove...... So if I want to limit my piston to being no more than 0.5mm out of the hole, I'm going to need to raise the pin about 0.21mm, and possibly squeeze the distance between ring grooves or squeeze the ring heights. That or go with thicker head gaskets.......or just leave the pin height as is and take a chance ![]() Thoughts? |
Author: | mk e [ Thu Aug 06, 2015 7:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
Who's making the pistons for you? What I normally do is tell them what I what for basic dimensions and let them recommend the specific design. Meaning, give them the deck height, rod length, desired CR, chamber cc, gasket thickness, and see what they have to say. On my engine I wanted the squish band to be about .035-.040 so the pistons pop out of the bores .015"...that change a lone would fix your problem. |
Author: | mk e [ Fri Aug 07, 2015 7:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
strange.......I wonder if the purpose is exactly to act as drains? That's the only thought I have on it. |
Author: | cribbj [ Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
That would have made "some" sense for the cutouts on the outboard (exhaust) side, which are lower than the inboard ones due to the Vee angle, but if so, why include those on the inboard side? It's definitely a strange looking piston crown and squish ring, but once I begin discussing these with CP I'll get their thoughts on why these were put there. The presence of these also kept Mahle from moving the ring packs much further up the piston. Notice there's a substantial amount of space between the top of the piston to the top compression ring, and when I pulled them, there was a substantial "ridge" of carbon in the tops of the liners. Again, this sorta reminds me of a diesel setup or possibly a turbo piston. |
Author: | a1exander [ Wed Aug 12, 2015 1:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
Is that combustion condensation or standing condensation? Looks odd. Not familiar with diesel pistons but that sure does look like a turbo piston |
Author: | TheDarkSideOfWill [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
Are those Mahle pistons MMC? Yes, those are very wide top ring lands. If you ditched the clearance notches, you could move the ring up and reduce crevice volume (GOOD!) while move the dish around to compensate for the increase in compression and keep the ring lands thick enough (neutral). Personally... i'd just get a couple of quotes for having shops mill 0.010" to 0.020" off the quench rings on the pistons. If you only have one head gasket thickness to chose from, do a trial assembly before hand to measure the piston deck clearance, then specify individual cut amounts for each piston in order to end up with a consistent 0.035" of piston to head clearance. The shop will have to have something like these: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/krc-1335 ![]() http://www.summitracing.com/parts/pow-pow351090 ![]() |
Author: | Madhatter [ Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:55 am ] | |||
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! | |||
After having issues with Wiesco and JE getting too expensive, toss in that our ferrari's use small bores and most all custom piston mfg use larger forgings. We've jumped over seas to an Italian place that makes pistons that look like jewelry and use forgings that are specific to the bore size we need, helps that they do Ferrari and Lambo pistons ![]() some pics of the render screen shot and installed in engine. This set is for the 4v 4L. narrow pin boss cross forging, short skirt.
|
Author: | cribbj [ Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
Madhatter wrote: ......helps that they do Ferrari and Lambo pistons ![]() Everything was sounding pretty good about them until that part ![]() |
Author: | Madhatter [ Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Deck Heights, Liner Heights, Pin Heights, Oh My! |
in what way? they are not the oem of course. here's their webpage. http://www.pistonispeciali.com |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |