gemellocattivo.com

Which means "Evil Twin". Lets see your projects where you change boring into fun or create the fun from scratch.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 308 suspension setup
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:10 am 
Online

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:47 pm
Posts: 4251
Sitting in my amazon cart waiting for me to get the engine back together and need it is scale....I would love to know what this engine weights. I expect the eng/trans with everything I've done to weight about 800lbs, I'll be sad if its 1000 but that is certainly a possibility....but I'll get that number before the engine goes back in the car. This will help me decide what to do roll center wise whenever I decide to tear into the suspension for real.

Installed the trans is sitting 1/4" higher that stock....it was that or notch the already soft frame to clear the flywheel. The engines crank though sits 2" lower and 3" forward of the the V8s so even with the added height of 60deg vs 90 and added weight 12 v 8, I'm pretty sure new mass center is lower and f/r split similar to stock or at least to the V8 with big supercharger that came out....but what to do suspension wise has been on my mind since I first bolted the 80 or 100 lbs of blower parts onto the top or the V8 and I'm clearly still undecided.

New rear springs arrived yesterday, 8" to replace 10"

Attachment:
20210414_170707-resized-1024.jpg
20210414_170707-resized-1024.jpg [ 307.38 KiB | Viewed 3522 times ]


Siting with the adjusters full up so rear as low as possible here it is

Attachment:
20210414_181220-resized-1024.jpg
20210414_181220-resized-1024.jpg [ 261.6 KiB | Viewed 3522 times ]


Last time when I measured the front I was looking at the valance and getting about 4.5". last night I laid down on the floor and discovered 4.5" at the valance is about 3.25" at the frame so the front goes plenty low. Right now the frame in the back is at 4.5" with no engine. If the engine is 1000lbs with exhaust and everything and the spring 500lb/in each and nearly 1:1 motion ratio the rear will be 3.5" full low so I guess it works out as this might work at an autocross but is too low for street use.

I can rise it about 2" which would be just about stock or perhaps a touch over so these springs seem good length wise.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 308 suspension setup
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 10:09 am 
Online

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:47 pm
Posts: 4251
This morning I was out putting down weed&feed.  Its kind of earlier but last year while building walls, regrade, and such I really let it go so I decided to hit the show parts of the lawn now then the whole lawn in a month at normal time.  I like to do the fed&feed first thing in the morning when the grass is damp so the stuff sticks....don't know if it actually helps but I've always believed it does so I use the push spreader not to wake the family with the tow spreader making the job slow and boring and giving me an uninterrupted hour to pond Ferrari 308 chassis design and I believe I had an epiphany.....the frames are actually pretty well designed but aren't finished.

Let me explain.  If you look at the FSAE frame I posted its a space frame which means it made straight pieces of tubing and EVERY external opening is a triangle, EVERY node is supported in 3 dimensions.  This means all the frame member are in tensions or compression with virtually no bending loads, the only exception is the suspension mounts which weren't designed yet when I did the frame and honestly none of us were very sure about how to design it so I used heavy members there to allow freedom to make changes.Even the cockpit opening is a triangle which is important becasue removing just the 2 bars that go over the driver's shoulder to triangulate the cockpit reduced the frames torsional stiffness by a factor 3...so remove those 2 pieced the weight about 2 lbs and you have 1/3 the stiffness you started with.   So that is a space frame, wonderful for a race car but clearly worthless for a street car and as a result street cars do not have space frames.

Street cars, and here I mean older street cars that have defined frames all have a version of a ladder frame....2 main rails with cross members. Even most of the new monoque (stressed skin, no real frame) stuff uses ladder like supports.  A 308 frame is made this way.  With a ladder frame there really is no clever way to keep things in tension/compression so the only way to make it stronger is to just make all the part bigger and heavier....I had a '65 vette and its frame tubes were about double the width of the 308 frame, at least from memory.....the 308 frame is pretty spindly really and ferrari use the exact same frame in the 288GTO (just a 4" stretch in the engine bay) and and the same frame on the F40.....

.....why I wonder?  They had to know it was a POS when even a casual observer can look at it say WTF were they thinking? so why?

Racing rules.

Every sanctioning body has cage requirements that mandate, imho, ridiculously heavy cages built in semi-foolish ways.  They do that so its easy to tech and hard to screw up so anything you bring that meets the rules is safe.  Take a street car, remove nothing structural, add all this new stuff.  Everybody needs to follow the rules so it doesn't matter that all the cars are 200-300lbs heavier than they could be, the racing is fair and everyone is safe.

So what does Ferrari, a company who sell street cars to pay for their race program do?  They design a nice bottom section of a cage with very little consideration of street performance to make the frame as light as they can get way with knowing old men driving on the street will never notice the flex (this is no doubt also way the stock springs were so soft, to help hide the frame flex issues) and the racers will add a cage, finishing the frame, and have a lighter, faster race car than anyone starting with a car designed as a good street car who then is forced to carry the heavy street frame around the race track. 

So they were either incredibly competent  or incredibly incompetent. I'm going will they were brilliant.....doesn't help me with my flexi street car issues but it does make a lot of sense. For me, where a cage is not happening there is a bit of a challenge.  The front wheels are basically at the front os the passenger compartment so there is little to nothing to be gained up front leaving the engine bay and passenger compartment.  with both causing about 1/2 the flex. 

The engine bay I can cage.  Once the engine is back in I'll design something to bolt on top.  On the FSAE frame I reamed the holes and used shoulder bolts on ends of the engine access tubes and that working out pretty well so I'm thinking something along those lines but beefier to deal with the bending loads I didn't have then but will have now.

The passenger compartment.....the only answer is more metal.  There is lots of room in the rocker panels but I need to figure out what to do with the cross members....there is a double floor where I lost that steering bolt a couple weeks ago, for sure I can replace that with something quite rigid....I need to model it up and play with it....in my spare time......


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 308 suspension setup
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:29 pm 
Online

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:47 pm
Posts: 4251
The MAT effort was mentioned a bit ago and somebody sent it to me
http://www.mat.fi/projects/59
http://www.mat.fi/gallery/56

I looked through it but will need to spent a bit more time staring at everything. Pretty sure they are working with an older, '76 I think, chassis that is a tiny bit different from mine.

I think too, and I might be wrong, that they are working with the original homologation specs and saying they need to make changes because the FIA cage rules have changed.....which may limit what they are allowed to change. I say that because they have some obvious misses like they have a couple diagonals added to the side of the engine bay (red in pic below) but to triangulate the top or bottom so the side pieces add bending strength but little torsional stiffness because the flex just moves to the weakest link location. Similar issue up front although probably less critical since the front is shorter length but still I'd want to get what there is to get and they didn't it doesn't look like so I suspect a rules issue.

Something to note, the bodywork clearly does nothing on their setup other than look pretty, its not structural in any way so Targa or coupe body you'd get the same answer.


Attachments:
engine bay.JPG
engine bay.JPG [ 77.78 KiB | Viewed 3506 times ]
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group